my transition to the role of bishop
Some have asked how all of this happened. It is true that my life has been on a trajectory toward this possibility for some time: serving as pastor of strong congregations, and as chair of oversight boards related to ordained ministers and bishops; being a part of two study commissions related to ordination, and working as a district superintendent these past fourteen months.
All of these experiences certainly have contributed toward a readiness for this role, if this is possible, but the journey is still a complex one, and no outcome is a given. In our tradition bishops are elected by broad constituencies of laity and clergy in a region. Many gifted persons have been on a similar journey and have not been called to the office of bishop; at the same time, many of these same persons have strengthened the church immeasurably in other ways. The process of being nominated for the role of bishop includes an extended and rigorous period of discernment. This includes interviews, written questions, personal conversations, prayer and developing relationships with other nominees and leaders in other conferences. In my own experience I sensed that I was placing my life and calling in the hands of other people, specifically men and women called by the church to make this decision.
Because I trusted and respected the process and these people, I determined early on that I would consider the action of the church, whatever than might be, to be God's purpose for my life. I had been a pastor for twenty-eight years prior to a brief tenure as a superintendent; I certainly enjoyed preaching, teaching, working alongside leaders toward a particular goal, and visiting with friends and listening in times of crisis. Had the church not called me to this office, I imagine that I would have re-focused my life toward pastoral ministry again. In time I would have considered that direction to be a blessing.
But the church has asked me to serve in a different way, one that is admittedly exciting and somewhat overwhelming. I have worked closely with bishops, but I have not served in this role, so I am clearly in a place of "not knowing what I do not know." At the same time, I have always been conscious that learning about a new place of ministry is an interesting part of the adventure.
In a few days we will be moving to Florida to begin this work. I will serve alongside a gifted group of leaders there, who know the culture and will help me to begin to grasp it. I will lead a conference that includes some of the strongest and largest congregations in our denomination and a number of the most gifted and visible leaders in our connection. I will give oversight to a region that is as diverse (in ethnicity) as any episcopal area in Methodism. I will assign pastors, ordain clergy and help over seven hundred churches and missions in their fundamental assignment: to make disciples of Jesus Christ for the transformation of the world.
In the words of the Service of Consecration, the calling of a bishop is expressed with clarity:
to guard the faith, to seek the unity,
and to exercise the discipline of the whole Church.;
and to supervise and support the Church's life, work,
and mission throughout the world.
This ministry will call forth all the experiences I have gained over time in reading and interpreting scripture and theology, in mediation and reconciliation, in holding others (and myself) accountable within a tradition of grace, and in leading an institution to align its resources with its mission in the world. As I recall the Service of Consecration, I remember both my own promises but also the response of all of those gathered to the question:
Will you uphold them in their ministries as bishops of the church?
And I remember hearing a resounding:
With God's help, we will.
I am grateful for the clear remembrance of the voice of the surrounding community that both calls and encourages in these days of transition.