can we ask new questions? (romans 12. 2)
Here is another one: if you are religiously conservative, you will be politically conservative. Often, but not always true. If may be that a careful, even literal reading of scripture about, say, the poor, would lead one to insist on a wider safety net for the most vulnerable and a preference for the common good over the free market. Peace can be understood in this way; as can liberation movements, from slavery to human trafficking.
Thinking through our assumptions, I am convinced, is more than a merely intellectual exercise. Why does sanctity of life not include both the unborn and the environment? Both would come within a doctrine of creation. Why does radical hospitality not include both the unborn, on the one hand, and gays and lesbians, on the other? Both would fall within a posture of inclusion. And why is it most often the case that a commitment to the sanctity of life or the practice of hospitality is not consistent? And is it any wonder that our theological commitments are often grounded in a particular political terrain, and over time takes on a tone void of humility or grace?
Mike Slaughter helped me to understand that we do often engage the culture, especially the political culture, uncritically, instead of searching for what he calls a "third way". And Andy Crouch, in a refreshing way, opened my eyes to see that our default perspective on culture is often negative. The church that is nourished by the grace of God and led into the mission of God will seek a way of life that is not constricted by political or economic reductionism. Instead, we will recover the ancient wisdom that is always relevant, and found in the words of the Apostle Paul: "Don't be conformed to the patterns of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your minds, so you can figure out what God's will is---what is good and pleasing and mature."(CEB)